# 1 February 2012

Road Danger Reduction Forum » The DfT Cyclist Safety study, risk compensation and cycle helmets

Interestingly, Morrongiello, B. A. and Major, K. (2002) Influence of safety gear on parental perceptions of injury risk and tolerance for children’s risk taking, found that parents tended towards the same biases. Thus, parents allowed their children to engage in greater risk-taking in activities such as bicycling when wearing safety gear than when not, and the parents’ explanations showed that they assumed the gear would fully protect their child – including even parts of the body not covered (e.g. a bike helmet would protect limbs) – and prevent injury regardless of the child’s level of risk taking. This optimistic, almost magical, reasoning seems to be shared by children and their parents during periods that may be formative in the development of safety orientation.

Filed under [Cycling] [Risk] [Numbers] [Helmets]
# 14 November 2011

Insurer won't pay for bike-deliverer hit to pregnant woman

“Next thing I knew, I was on the ground, and I had passed out or blacked out for the moment,” Burke said. “The delivery guy … had no helmet on. He was going in the wrong direction.”

This sucks, but I don’t know why anyone would prefer to collide with someone wearing a helmet. We’re actually better off when we’re walking if cyclists are not wearing crash helmets and motorists are not wearing crash harnesses, equipment that exists only to prepare them for crashes that our own flesh might be involved in.

Filed under [Cycling] [Walking] [Crashes] [Helmets]
# 27 October 2011

The Surprising Psychology of Driver Interaction With Cyclists

Wearing a helmet may buy you extra protection from head injuries but it won’t buy you extra caution from motorists, studies have shown.

On the other hand, wearing a helmet may not buy you any extra protection from head injuries, and a second study has shown that it will buy you less caution from motorists.

Risk compensation: it’s a bastard!

Filed under [Cycling] [Risk] [Helmets] [Attire] [Autos] [Priorities] [Streetsblog]
# 30 August 2011
“As everyone noticed, helmets are playing a crucial role in the uncool aspect of things.” (via Copenhagenize.com)

“As everyone noticed, helmets are playing a crucial role in the uncool aspect of things.” (via Copenhagenize.com)

Filed under [Cycling] [Autos] [Risk] [Australia] [Helmets] [Copenhagenize] [Comments]
# 24 August 2011

Taboo Island

Leland & co.

Leland and I went to Governor’s Island a few weeks ago. We’ve been enjoying the island for years (just like we felt the earthquake before you, etc.).

It’s actually getting a bit too crowded these days. Particularly the ferries. With the bicycles and all, it’s kind of not worth the trouble if you’ve already seen what there is to see. But anyway.

There’s a point to this. It is to bitch about a particular absurdity, like usual.

carts

You can probably not really tell what’s happening in this enlargement, but if you’ve been to Governor’s before you can fill in the rest from memory. There’s a gas-burning golf cart on the left, and one of those hilarious pedal-powered rental carts (like this) on the right.

Now here’s the thing: the pedal cart has four (4) wheels. It’s funny looking, but the really crazy thing is that many people on these carts are wearing bicycle crash helmets, and everyone under 12 years-old is. Yes. Apparently some total loser decided that the state’s bicycle child helmet law applies to this very slow moving, impossible to flip vehicle.

In the photo it is being passed by the motorized golf cart, which had just buzzed past me for the second time. The motor cart not only has a much higher top speed than the pedal cart, but they can and do get turned over from time to time. And who’s on its back seat facing us? Just a mother and her 8 year-old son—with both of their craniums terrifyingly exposed to the hazards of the world! Quick, somebody raise their insurance premiums and chastise them for wanting to be “vegetable” burdens on their families.

Honestly, nobody in this picture needs a freaking crash helmet, but sitting backwards on a cart that can accelerate abruptly is a little dicey. The mom had her arm protectively around the kid, which was probably enough. And I mean, we won’t get into the fact that no one needs a gas-powered cart to get around this tiny island in the first place.

But yeah. It’s pretty stupid that the safer human powered option is subject to a higher, sillier safety standard than a friggin’ golf-cart. It makes no sense if you think about it for two seconds; we are just doing free-association for our safety rules these days. Does it has pedals? Must wear HELMUTTTTT.

And Gov Island is so over anyway. See you on Roosevelt Island, or something.

Filed under [Cycling] [NYC] [Risk] [Helmets] [Pictures]
# 12 May 2011
“Our democracy, our rules” — seriously (via Punk Commute - Sydney - June 20th 2011)

“Our democracy, our rules” — seriously (via Punk Commute - Sydney - June 20th 2011)

Filed under [Cycling] [Australia] [Risk] [Helmets] [Laws] [Copenhagenize]
# 28 February 2011

Satan and Transportation Alternatives in minor disaccord

We would put cameras in bicycle lanes to make sure that bicyclists are wearing their helmets and have their lights on and are riding in a manner which is accustomed to the lane or if they’re being reckless and endangering and hurting others. I believe it also gives more credibility to bicyclists, making them more a part of the road.

Michael DenDekker, a Queens Democrat

The first sentence sounds like Satan, the second sounds like Transportation Alternatives. They both support the premise that all cyclists must submit to every inherited oil- and blood-soaked traffic law in the city and state or else none deserve any accommodation on public streets. Satan has conjured a helmet law, to boot! But only TA is surprised and upset by the consequences of their thinking: a crude, unhelpful police crackdown on cyclists.

At least Satan is logically consistent.

Filed under [Cycling] [Gothamist] [Helmets] [Licensing] [NYC] [Queens] [Thanks!] [Transportation Alternatives] [Democrats]
# 21 February 2011
It is very difficult to take politicians and car driving safety experts seriously when they know so little about head injuries that they don’t wear a bicycle helmet in their own cars.
Filed under [Helmets] [Autos] [Cycling] [Risk] [Traffic] [Australia] [Copenhagenize]
# 8 February 2011

Cop Tickets Cyclist for Not Wearing Helmet (Not Illegal, FYI)

Way to go, everyone who advocated a helmet law to protect those helpless working cyclists! Because that is what foam headgear does, it protects people from 2-ton automobiles while our Democratic elite systematically undermines a mayoral administration’s unexpected effort to actually save people’s lives by physically blocking motor vehicles from running them over.

Thanks to that inspiring and compassionate helmet law to save the “delivery cyclists”, the NYPD is now extra-super-duper confused about who is legally required to wear that very special piece of sports equipment and if you explain it to them, they will just demand proof that you are not “working”.

Filed under [Cycling] [Gothamist] [Helmets] [NYC] [Police] [Risk] [Safety] [WTG] [Thanks!]
# 7 January 2011
when certain people reach the point of believing life is a series of hospital visits punctuated by a few short spells of living then it’s almost impossible to argue reasonably with them.
Filed under [Comments] [Cycling] [Risk] [Helmets] [Copenhagenize]